Skip to content

Simplify substituters #3215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2017
Merged

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Sep 30, 2017

RefinedTypes and TypeAliases are not longer very common, so no need
to specialize for them.

RefinedTypes and TypeAliases are not longer very common, so no need
to specialize for them.
@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Sep 30, 2017

test performance please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 0 running.

@odersky odersky requested a review from smarter September 30, 2017 09:14
@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Sep 30, 2017

The rest of the optimizations in #3033 are a bit ugly. I'll see whether we can do a more systematic treatment based on visitors.

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

Performance test finished successfully:

Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/3215/ to see the changes.

Benchmarks is based on merge(s) with master

@odersky odersky merged commit f59fdd8 into scala:master Sep 30, 2017
@allanrenucci allanrenucci deleted the optimize-applied-type branch December 14, 2017 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants