-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Make case class hashCode take class into account #2159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ | ||
Foo(true,-1,-1,d,-5,-10,500.0,500.0,List(),5.0) | ||
Foo(true,-1,-1,d,-5,-10,500.0,500.0,List(),5) | ||
1383698062 | ||
1383698062 | ||
205963949 | ||
205963949 | ||
true | ||
## method 1: 1383698062 | ||
## method 2: 1383698062 | ||
## method 1: 205963949 | ||
## method 2: 205963949 | ||
Murmur 1: 1383698062 | ||
Murmur 2: 1383698062 |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
scalac
usesproductPrefix
(which is user definable), rather than the class name.What is the definition of
fullName
for non-member classes?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the motivation behind this?
Product prefix isn't required to even return the same value, so one can break hash-code by returning different values there.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neither are the case accessors (they could be
var
s).I guess a motivation would be to have more stable hash codes for a local case class so that it wasn't volatile wrt fresh name suffixes. Perhaps this implementation acheives the same by inlining
fullName
, rather than callingthis.getClass.toString
).I'm just pointing out the deviation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK, The full name here won't include any fresh name suffices. They will be only added after Flatten. Two local classes with the same name will get the same constant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see now, though, that a mutable
productPrefix
would be worse that a var accessor, asequals
does not check thatthis.productPrefix == that.productPrefix
.