-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Refactor function type logic #18193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Refactor function type logic #18193
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c03d69f
Rename `isFunctionType` to `isFunctionNType`
nicolasstucki d7167b0
Rename `isFunctionOrPoly` to `isFunctionType`
nicolasstucki 63fa75a
More consistent use of `is{Refined,Poly,Erased}isFunctionType`
nicolasstucki a420d71
Generalize/simplify refined function type Erasure
nicolasstucki 8a202e5
Remove use of `isFunctionNType`
nicolasstucki 81f5677
Fix toFunctionType to handle erased function types
nicolasstucki 3ea39ea
Simplify function erasure
nicolasstucki aca69bd
Refactor toFunctionType
nicolasstucki 96af363
Rename isRefinedFunctionType to isPolyOrErasedFunctionType
nicolasstucki 21818e7
Fix documentation
nicolasstucki File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of adding a case, I suggest changing the existing
case mt: MethodType if !mt.isParamDependent =>
case to contain anif mt.hasErasedParams then ... else ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also moved
!mt.isParamDependent
into assertions to make it clear that this is unexpected.