Skip to content

Clarify requiredness of the main method being on an object named Test #18078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

Clarify requiredness of the main method being on an object named Test #18078

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

Sporarum
Copy link
Contributor

It was not clear before if such a main method was required for a main test without checkfile

@Sporarum Sporarum requested a review from bishabosha June 27, 2023 13:34
@bishabosha bishabosha enabled auto-merge June 27, 2023 13:38
@bishabosha bishabosha merged commit 202eb59 into main Jun 27, 2023
@bishabosha bishabosha deleted the Sporarum-patch-1 branch June 27, 2023 15:49
@Kordyjan Kordyjan mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2023
Merged
Kordyjan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
@Kordyjan
Backport "Clarify requiredness of the main method being on an object …
2c550a5 
…named `Test`" to LTS (#19047)

Backports #18078 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.3.2 milestone Dec 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bishabosha bishabosha bishabosha approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.3.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Sporarum @bishabosha @Kordyjan