Fix signatures involving WildcardTypes #12240
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A
WildcardType
never appears in the type of a tree, but it can appearin an expected type and because TypeComparer checks if
tp1.signature consistentParams tp2.signature
, we can end up callingsigName
on aWildcardType
.Before this commit, the result was either a custom type name or the
upper-bound of the wildcard, but both of these options means that
consistentParams
could return false in situations where the two methodtypes would in fact match. We fix this by always returning
tpnme.Uninstantiated
, meaning thatconsistentParams
will alwaysallow a wildcard to match any other type. This does not cause any
over-approximation because the TypeComparer will always check that the
actual types match after checking that the signatures match.
Also use tpnme.ERROR instead of tpnme.Wildcard for ErrorType and NoType
to make it easier to spot their usage.
Fixes #11481.