-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Changes to wildApprox #1054
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes to wildApprox #1054
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See comment in new overloaded variant of wildApprox for an explanation. Fixes scala#1044. Review by @smarter.
@@ -379,6 +379,19 @@ object ProtoTypes { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** Like wildApprox, but assume that all parameters of `disregarded` are not |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit weird to say "Like wildApprox" when this method is called wildApprox too, maybe use another name, or say, "Like the other overload of wildApprox"?
smarter
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2016
When `wildApprox` encounters a PolyParam it approximates it by its bounds in the current constraint set, this only makes sense if we have added the PolyType corresponding to this PolyParam to the constrain set using `ProtoTypes#constrained`, otherwise, we might get the bounds of another use of this `PolyType`. This is exactly what happened in i1044.scala: to compile, the implicit view `refArrayOps` needs to be used twice with two different type parameters. The fix is to always constrain polymorphic implicit views before calling `wildApprox` on their result type. This fix was inspired by the approach of scala#1054.
smarter
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2016
When `wildApprox` encounters a PolyParam it approximates it by its bounds in the current constraint set, this only makes sense if we have added the PolyType corresponding to this PolyParam to the constrain set using `ProtoTypes#constrained`, otherwise, we might get the bounds of another use of this `PolyType`. This is exactly what happened in i1044.scala: to compile, the implicit view `refArrayOps` needs to be used twice with two different type parameters. The fix is to always constrain polymorphic implicit views before calling `wildApprox` on their result type. This fix was inspired by the approach of scala#1054.
I have an alternative fix which I think is a cleaner solution: #1056 |
smarter
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2016
When `wildApprox` encounters a PolyParam it approximates it by its bounds in the current constraint set, but this is incorrect if `TypevarsMissContext` is set, we might get the bounds of another use of this `PolyType`. This is exactly what happened in i1044.scala where the implicit view `refArrayOps` needs to be used twice with two different type parameters. The fix is to approximate a PolyParam by its original bounds in its PolyType if `TypevarsMissContext` is set. This fix was inspired by the approach of scala#1054.
smarter
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2016
When `wildApprox` encounters a PolyParam it approximates it by its bounds in the current constraint set, but this is incorrect if `TypevarsMissContext` is set, we might get the bounds of another use of this `PolyType`. This is exactly what happened in i1044.scala where the implicit view `refArrayOps` needs to be used twice with two different type parameters. The fix is to approximate a PolyParam by its original bounds in its PolyType if `TypevarsMissContext` is set. This fix was inspired by the approach of scala#1054.
Superceded by #1064 |
OlivierBlanvillain
pushed a commit
to OlivierBlanvillain/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
OlivierBlanvillain
pushed a commit
to OlivierBlanvillain/dotty
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See comment in new overloaded variant of wildApprox for an explanation.
Fixes #1044.
Review by @smarter.