Closed
Description
Minimized code
class Foo[T]
Output
public <T extends java.lang.Object> Foo();
descriptor: ()V
[..]
Signature: #9 // <T:Ljava/lang/Object;>()V
Expectation
No Signature on the constructor. Compare against the equivalent Java:
$ echo 'class Foo<T> {}' > Foo.java && javac Foo.java && javap -v Foo
Classfile /d/mima/Foo.class
Last modified 17 Dec 2020; size 243 bytes
MD5 checksum 33fcdfd618f6e8ce83505acaa1f16ed2
Compiled from "Foo.java"
class Foo<T extends java.lang.Object> extends java.lang.Object
minor version: 0
major version: 55
flags: (0x0020) ACC_SUPER
this_class: #2 // Foo
super_class: #3 // java/lang/Object
interfaces: 0, fields: 0, methods: 1, attributes: 2
Constant pool:
#1 = Methodref #3.#12 // java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
#2 = Class #13 // Foo
#3 = Class #14 // java/lang/Object
#4 = Utf8 <init>
#5 = Utf8 ()V
#6 = Utf8 Code
#7 = Utf8 LineNumberTable
#8 = Utf8 Signature
#9 = Utf8 <T:Ljava/lang/Object;>Ljava/lang/Object;
#10 = Utf8 SourceFile
#11 = Utf8 Foo.java
#12 = NameAndType #4:#5 // "<init>":()V
#13 = Utf8 Foo
#14 = Utf8 java/lang/Object
{
Foo();
descriptor: ()V
flags: (0x0000)
Code:
stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: return
LineNumberTable:
line 1: 0
}
Signature: #9 // <T:Ljava/lang/Object;>Ljava/lang/Object;
SourceFile: "Foo.java"
(Signature #9 is the class Signature.) Scala 2 doesn't emit this, which I perceive as correct.
This came up in the context of trialing MiMa on different versions of a library compiled with the Scala 3 compiler and some changes are resulting in additional, unexpected constructor signature changes - however signature checking is an opt-in feature of MiMa, so this wouldn't affect all MiMa users.