Create and publish release v1.0.6

[biswanaths]

Things to do before release

• Release draft, find it here https://github.com/scala/scala-xml/releases/edit/untagged-3389094b9a5a81b5e242
• Bump version in build.sbt (Already done c09fc07)
• Post release Bump version for the next release

@SethTisue , @adriaanm , @ashawley Please do let me know, if I am missing anything for the release.

[ashawley]

@biswanaths Happy to review, but I can't see draft releases it seems.

[adriaanm]

Here's the draft. Is it time to add @ashawley to the committers team, @biswanaths? :-)

The following changes have been incorporated in this release

• Administrative:
  • Remove stale branch, wip/jsuereth-use-module-plugin
  • Update crossScalaVersions to 2.11.8 from 2.11.7
  • Update crossScalaVersions to 2.12.0-M3 from 2.12.0-M1 and 2.12.0-M2
  • Change mimaPreviousVersion in build.sbt to more recent scala-xml than 1.0.1
  • Ask Scala compiler to update versions.properties to next release of scala-xml
• Following issues has been fixed and enhancements are been made:
  • Merged opt-in to Travis's newer/faster container-based infrastructure #67 Travis container changes
  • Merged Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md #69, moving the gitter link to the right place #70, update readme now that we have a maintainer #80 README updates
  • Merged Add more XML attribute unit tests for SI-9047 #78 Add more unit tests for SI-9047: Extract attributes from multiple elements #43
  • Merged Use NodeSeq.fromSeq instead of new NodeSeq { val theSeq = ... } #81 Use NodeSeq.fromSeq
  • Merged Remove final keyword from scala.xml.MetaData per note #84 Remove final keyword from scala.xml.MetaData per FIXME
  • Merged Fix #58 (SI-4528) BasicTransformer has no longer exponential complexity  #59 Exponential complexity in BasicTransformer fixing BasicTransformer has exponential complexity #58
  • Merged Enabling builds for java 1.7 and 1.9 #87 Enable SBT builds for Java 1.7 and 1.9
  • Merged Unit test for verifying complexity of basic transformer #88 Unit test for verifying complexity in Fix #58 (SI-4528) BasicTransformer has no longer exponential complexity  #59
  • Merged Nested XML adds empty xmlns attribute #45 #91 Empty xmlns attribute fixes NamespaceBinding.buildString inproper handling of TopScope #45
  • Merged Fix #35 OOM on malformed input #92 Fix OOM on malformed input #35 OOM on malformed input

This release was made possible by contributions from @SethTisue,@adriaanm, @ashawley, @lrytz, @som-snytt.
We would like to thank them for their help.

[adriaanm]

Those are some nice release notes! Looks like you're all set for v1.0.6! Once you publish the release, the commit will be tagged and travis will stage a release on sonatype. Let me know when it's done so I can push the button to promote the staging repo to maven central.

[som-snytt]

Thanks for the mention, @adriaanm . I didn't have the gumption to adopt the module, but it's nice to see folks step up who can also exercise it!

[ashawley]

@biswanaths Release notes look good!

All the items under "Administrative" are TBD -- they're not done yet. I only proposed those things. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Were you planning on doing them?

[adriaanm]

@som-snytt, I'd love to take credit, but I didn't write the release notes, was just pasting them. @biswanaths wrote them

[som-snytt]

Thanks @biswanaths ! What conscientiousness! Except for the part about not pasting the release notes. Just kidding!

[lespea]

Any update on getting this released?

[biswanaths]

I would like to address this #99 before pushing the release. Seems we are missing some paths for the OOM fix. Hopefully in couple of days.

[lespea]

Oh yeah that seems like a good plan. Thanks for the update!

[ashawley]

Change mimaPreviousVersion in build.sbt to more recent scala-xml than 1.0.1

I tried making this change in #98, but it didn't ended up going very smoothly for reasons I don't understand. It's not a blocker for the next release, though.

[ashawley]

Ok, I resolved the issue with Mima by adding a commit to #98 that fixed it. I'd say we are good to release a new version of scala-xml once #98 and #100 are merged!

Any ETA when this release due out in the wild? Keen to see #59 & #99 get out there. Looks like most things are ready to go. TIA

[sarahgerweck]

Like @devisaneer, I'd love to see this as well: the fix to #45 / #91 is something that would be quite useful for my project.