Skip to content

make Scalafix blog post not so entirely Dotty-centric #513

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2016

Conversation

SethTisue
Copy link
Member

we hope and expect that Scalafix will be useful in a Scala 2
context, too. here are some proposed changes that reflect
that hope.

review by @heathermiller @olafurpg

reference: https://twitter.com/adriaanm/status/791077865672495104

Ólafur: using Scalafix in a Scala 2 context isn't really something
we've discussed, but it's certainly part of our plans! We hope it's
part of yours, too.

we hope and expect that Scalafix will be useful in a Scala 2
context, too.  here are some proposed changes that reflect
that hope.
@olafurpg
Copy link
Contributor

olafurpg commented Nov 8, 2016

LGTM 👍 I'm glad you noticed there is nothing Dotty specific about scalafix. The post focused on Dotty only because that's my assignment at the Scala Center.

Thanks!

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member

LGTM! Thanks for the additions, @SethTisue

@heathermiller heathermiller merged commit ba5323f into scala:master Nov 8, 2016
@SethTisue SethTisue deleted the scalafix-and-scala-2 branch November 8, 2016 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants