Skip to content

clarify structure of the code of conduct #395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2016

Conversation

SethTisue
Copy link
Member

after proposing the adoption of the CoC on the #scala IRC channel,
I got some feedback from a few people that the "Be excellent"
part was... a little weird.

I've addressed that as follows in two ways:

  1. Replacing the "be excellent" wording (because it sounds too much
    like Bill and Ted)

  2. Separating the four points of the code into "rules" and
    "guidelines", so it's clearer which parts of the code are about
    what is actually allowed

review by @heathermiller @propensive @dickwall @jsuereth @copumpkin

after proposing the adoption of the CoC on the #scala IRC channel,
I got some feedback from a few people that the "Be excellent"
part was... a little weird.

I've addressed that as follows in two ways:

1) Replacing the "be excellent" wording (because it sounds too much
   like Bill and Ted)

2) Separating the four points of the code into "rules" and
   "guidelines", so it's clearer which parts of the code are about
   what is actually allowed
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

the phrase "be excellent" is also now associated with a philosophy that no CoC is needed other than to say "Be excellent to each other". I don't think that association existed when this code was originally drafted, but it does now. see e.g. https://plus.google.com/+HannahGrimm/posts/5517czLTefa

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

@heathermiller ping

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the ping. I completely missed this. LGTM! Thanks!

heathermiller added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2016
clarify structure of the code of conduct
@heathermiller heathermiller merged commit efa3264 into scala:master Jan 25, 2016
@SethTisue SethTisue deleted the coc-structure branch January 25, 2016 21:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants