Jekyll 3.9.0 upgrade, also kramdown upgrade #1157
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is comparable to scala/docs.scala-lang#1756. the motivation is
the same: we got a security alert about kramdown.
but it went a bit differently in this repo. if I did
bundle update jekyll
that went all the way to some 4.x version. I don't know why.but it seems safer to do a smaller upgrade first.
bundle update --minor jekyll
got us to 3.9.0, but then kramdown didn't get updated,so I followed it with
bundle update kramdown
(after addingkramdown-parser-gfm
toGemfile
, as in the other PR)since I didn't do a full
bundle update
, I didn't need to revertany version bump of jekyll-redirect-from
so.... it's not great that this doesn't bring the two repos exactly
in sync, but oh well. I'm trying to resolve the security issue without
putting excess effort into it.
I wouldn't oppose followup PR(s) that reduce the deltas between the
repos.