-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
SIP Minutes December 2017 #951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Great job. I’m merging this but if someone has another comment please feel free to write it here or fix something by sending a PR.
* Seth Tisue ([@SethTisue](https://github.com/SethTisue)), Lightbend | ||
* Sébastien Doeraene ([@sjrd](https://github.com/sjrd)), EPFL | ||
* Eugene Burmako ([@xeno-by](https://github.com/xeno-by)), Twitter | ||
* Iulian Dragos ([@dragos](https://github.com/dragos)), Independent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Triplequote
The Committee proceeds with voting on numbering the SIP. | ||
|
||
**Conclusion**: The SIP-NN is numbered, from now SIP-36, it will be discussed once results of the Typelevel implementation are ready. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a title here? Something like extra
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed, good point, thanks!
No description provided.