Skip to content

Corrects a mistake in the article on implicit conversions #710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2017

Conversation

codeZeilen
Copy link
Contributor

This is a very minor correction to address the issue discussed on disqus. It makes the example easier to understand.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

thank you!

@SethTisue SethTisue merged commit 1b55033 into scala:master Feb 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants