-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Update status of proposals #637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update status of proposals #637
Conversation
For the explanation of under revision, see SIP spec.
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: sip | |||
title: SIP-18 - Modularizing Language Features | |||
|
|||
vote-status: accepted | |||
vote-text: This is in Accept status, pending implementation. Let the record show Paul is against it. | |||
vote-text: This SIP has already been accepted with the vote against of Paul. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer the original wording. Why did this need to be updated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just wanted to emphasize that it was accepted, meaning that it's been already merged into scalac. Will change.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ disqus: true | |||
title: SIP-20 - Improved Lazy Vals Initialization | |||
|
|||
vote-status: under review | |||
vote-text: Next iteration takes place in October 2016. | |||
vote-text: Dormant. This proposal lacks an implementation for Scalac and is looking for a new author. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking for a new owner, not author.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ disqus: true | |||
title: SIP-22 - Async | |||
|
|||
vote-status: postponed | |||
vote-text: Authors have asked to postpone until further notice. They will eventually open the proposal when some details in the implementation are ready. Check <a href="http://localhost:4000/sips/minutes/sip-minutes.html">July's minutes</a>. | |||
vote-text: Authors have asked to postpone this proposal until further notice. They will eventually open the proposal when some details in the implementation are ready. Check <a href="http://localhost:4000/sips/minutes/sip-minutes.html">July's minutes</a>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this dormant? They don't plan on picking it up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, dormant is more appropriate in this case.
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ | |||
layout: sip | |||
disqus: true | |||
title: SIP-23 - Literal-based singleton types | |||
|
|||
vote-status: dormant | |||
vote-text: This proposal is dormant because original authors are not available for its review. There is an implementation <a href="https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/5310">here</a>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you test this locally? I was under the impression that links don't work in front-matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again, owner, not author.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, they work.
vote-status: under review | ||
vote-text: The following proposal needs to be updated, since only the specialized case version (with new lines) has been accepted. For more information, check the <a href="http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/minutes/sip-20th-september-minutes.html">minutes</a>. | ||
vote-status: approved | ||
vote-text: The following proposal has been approved but the spec needs to be updated and the implementation has to be ported from Parsers to Scanner. For more information, check the minutes in November 2017. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
November 2017? Do you mean November 2016? In any case, these minutes do not exist yet, so it's impossible to check this. Perhaps omit this until you have done the minutes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I will omit it for now. Thanks for the catch in the date.
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ | |||
layout: sip | |||
title: SIP 25 - Trait Parameters | |||
disqus: true | |||
|
|||
vote-status: under review | |||
vote-text: The board agreed to schedule the next iteration of the evaluation process in 6 months, since there’s no implementation yet and the authors need time to produce one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression that this was dormant and needs a new owner. Martin was not going to implement this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is extracted from the Outcome
section of July's minutes. In that meeting, we agreed that we would give authors 6 months for a second review. If there is no implementation in that review, we can put it as dormant, but it's not yet.
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ | |||
layout: sip | |||
title: SIP-24 - Repeated By Name Parameters | |||
disqus: true | |||
|
|||
vote-status: dormant | |||
vote-text: Looking for a new author. This proposal needs to be updated according to the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrxp4PGbi6s">SIP meeting in November 2016</a>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Owner, not author.
@jvican hoping we could get this across the finish line...? |
Hey @SethTisue, updating tomorrow! Sorry this fell through the cracks. |
@heathermiller This is ready for review again 😄 |
Thanks @jvican and @SethTisue!! ❤️ |
This PR goes through outdated proposals and update them with their latest status. Review by @SethTisue | @martijnhoekstra.