Update fr translation to last en cheatsheet content and fix some errors #614
Conversation
|
Thanks. I don't read french but it looks good. 👍 |
| | `for (x <- xs; y <- ys) yield x*y` _est équivalent à_ <br>`xs flatMap {x => ys map {y => x*y}}` | compréhension avec for : produit cartésien. | | ||
| | `for (x <- xs; y <- ys) {`<br> `println("%d/%d = %.1f".format(x,y, x*y))`<br>`}` | compréhension avec for : à la manière impérative <br>[sprintf-style](http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Formatter.html#syntax) | | ||
| | `for (i <- 1 to 5) {`<br> `println(i)`<br>`}` | compréhension avec for : itère jusqu'à la borne supérieure comprise. | | ||
| | `for (i <- 1 until 5) {`<br> `println(i)`<br>`}` | compréhension avec for : itère jusqu'à la borne supérieure non comprise. | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder whether "for en compréhension" would be a more exact translation of "for comprehension". After all, this what we use in math: we can define "un ensemble en compréhension" (the syntax { x € Z | x > -10 }).
But that's French pedantry. TBH when I speak French I say "for comprehension" in English anyway. I would stick to the English term for this.
|
Hi, |
No description provided.