Skip to content

Scope of name #2636

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2022
Merged

Scope of name #2636

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2022

Conversation

som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

It's only by coincidence I just watched the recent odersky keynote in which he mentions sbt's contribution to the complexity budget.

Instead of complexity budget, we should speak of raising the technical debt ceiling for the complexity budget of the ecosystem.

@sjrd sjrd merged commit 1aaecab into scala:main Nov 17, 2022
@som-snytt som-snytt deleted the faq/sbt-name branch November 17, 2022 16:03
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

In my opinion, this PR, though obviously well-intentioned, should not have been merged.

FAQ answers should be as short as possible. If such a lengthy and nuanced disquisition on this subject is needed, it should live elsewhere, and the FAQ should link to it.

See my recent remarks about the scope of the FAQ at #2657.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

reversion PR: #2658

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants