Skip to content

fix typo #2118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2021
Merged

fix typo #2118

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2021

Conversation

performantdata
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ many important Scala libraries. The lack of first class syntax for literal types
authors to use the experimental Scala macro system to provide a means to express them. Whilst this
has proved to be extremely successful, it has poor ergonomics (although this can typically be hidden
from library _users_) and is not portable -- because Scala macros in general and the mechanisms used
to expose literal types to Scala programmes in particular depend on internal implementation details
to expose literal types to Scala programs in particular depend on internal implementation details
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unsure if there's a standard here…

@Philippus Philippus merged commit 63729b0 into scala:main Jul 12, 2021
@performantdata performantdata deleted the patch-1 branch July 12, 2021 19:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants