Fix the sentence that says how SIP committee members are elected. #1320
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SethTisue
reviewed
Apr 30, 2019
_sips/sip-submission.md
Outdated
| and participate into the discussions. The members are elected by the Process | ||
| Lead based on their expertise and implication in the community. | ||
| and participate into the discussions. New members are elected by existing | ||
| members of the SIP Committee, based on their expertise and implication in the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/implication/involvement/
"implication" is usually used in reference to crime, you're implicated in something bad, not something good
This is not a change of the actual process. We've always done it that way (or least as far as I've been in the committee).
SethTisue
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is not a change of the actual process. We've always done it that way (or least as far as I've been in the committee).
I wanted to cite that page from https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/scala-governance/3218, but then discovered the existing wording did not fit the reality.