Scala standard library: SIP or SPP?

[SethTisue]

http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/index.html has the Scala standard library as under the control of the SPP committee. Is that really the case? My understanding was that since SLIP was shut down, the core Scala standard library went back under SIP, and that SPP covers everything but scala-library.jar.

(@jvican? @adriaanm?)

[jvican]

@SethTisue IIRC, the consensus is that the SIP Committee is in charge of the to-be Scala Core, whereas anything considered previously part of the Scala Library will be under control of the SPP Committee. Does this sound reasonable?

[adriaanm]

I’d say the standard library is part of the core, once we’re done modularising in 2.13

…

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 15:23 Jorge ***@***.***> wrote: @SethTisue <https://github.com/sethtisue> IIRC, the consensus is that the SIP Committee is in charge of the to-be Scala Core, whereas anything considered previously part of the Scala Library will be under control of the SPP Committee. Does this sound reasonable? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#943 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFjywn6aPPh2F6qvYlJA1HQQRHMQl_xks5s8dvigaJpZM4QzbrW> .

[SethTisue]

it sounds like we're all on the same page here. I'll make a PR proposing alternate wording on that page

[SethTisue]

PR #958