Skip to content

Fix small typo on enums.md #361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2022
Merged

Fix small typo on enums.md #361

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion reference/src/layout/enums.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ variants.
This layout, while more compatible and arguably more obvious, is also
less efficient than the non-C compatible layout in some cases in terms
of total size. For example, the `TwoCases` example given in the
preivous section only occupies 4 bytes with `#[repr(u8)]`, but would
previous section only occupies 4 bytes with `#[repr(u8)]`, but would
occupy 6 bytes with `#[repr(C, u8)]`, as more padding is required.

**Example.** The following enum:
Expand Down