Fix x test src/librustdoc with download-rustc enabled
#95369
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The problem was two-fold: - Bootstrap was hard-coding that unit tests should always run with stage1, not stage2, and - It hard-coded the sysroot layout in stage1, which puts libLLVM.so in `lib/rustlib/` instead of just `lib/`.
Previously, it would erroneously try to run the doc-tests anyway and give an error: ``` Doc-tests rustdoc thread 'main' panicked at 'RUSTDOC_LIBDIR was not set', src/bootstrap/bin/rustdoc.rs:15:48 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace error: test failed, to rerun pass '--doc' ```
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 26cc0be has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2022
Fix `x test src/librustdoc` with `download-rustc` enabled The problem was two-fold: - Bootstrap was hard-coding that unit tests should always run with stage1, not stage2, and - It hard-coded the sysroot layout in stage1, which puts libLLVM.so in `lib/rustlib/` instead of just `lib/`. This also takes the liberty of fixing `test src/librustdoc --no-doc`, which has been broken since it was first added. It would be nice at some point to unify this logic with other tests; I opened a Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Inconsistency.20in.20.60x.20test.60 Fixes rust-lang#91071.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94794 (Clarify indexing into Strings) - rust-lang#95361 (Make non-power-of-two alignments a validity error in `Layout`) - rust-lang#95369 (Fix `x test src/librustdoc` with `download-rustc` enabled ) - rust-lang#95805 (Left overs of rust-lang#95761) - rust-lang#95808 (expand: Remove `ParseSess::missing_fragment_specifiers`) - rust-lang#95817 (hide another #[allow] directive from a docs example) - rust-lang#95831 (Use bitwise XOR in to_ascii_uppercase) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem was two-fold:
lib/rustlib/instead of justlib/.This also takes the liberty of fixing
test src/librustdoc --no-doc, which has been broken since it was first added. It would be nice at some point to unify this logic with other tests; I opened a Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Inconsistency.20in.20.60x.20test.60Fixes #91071.