-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Remove impossible panic note from Vec::append
#95214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> Vec<T, A> { | |
/// | ||
/// # Panics | ||
/// | ||
/// Panics if the number of elements in the vector overflows a `usize`. | ||
/// Panics if the new capacity exceeds `isize::MAX` bytes. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think the wording here (and in fn main() {
let mut vec = vec![(); usize::MAX];
assert_eq!(vec.len(), usize::MAX);
assert_eq!(vec.capacity(), usize::MAX);
assert!(vec.capacity() > usize::try_from(isize::MAX).unwrap());
vec.append(&mut vec![]);
assert!(vec.capacity() > usize::try_from(isize::MAX).unwrap());
} I would rather change both panic notes to use a different terminology like There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note: It's also not directly related to the What replacement would you suggest?
It seems to me that this would introduce another terminology and would thus make the note harder to understand. |
||
/// | ||
/// # Examples | ||
/// | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.