-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Add initial implementation of HIR-based WF checking for diagnostics #83898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ impl TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentContext<'tcx> { | |
obligation: obligation.clone(), | ||
code: FulfillmentErrorCode::CodeAmbiguity, | ||
points_at_arg_span: false, | ||
// FIXME - does Chalk have a notation of 'root obligation'? | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. cc @rust-lang/wg-traits: Does Chalk have a way of getting the obligation first passed to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Well, does Chalk? No. Chalk only takes a goal and produces an answer. Does the chalk_fulfill code? I'm not sure, I'll have to go back through this. I imagine that the code here is most correct. The rustc trait solver will register predicates as it tries to solve a predicate, whereas Chalk won't, it just gives back an answer. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, chalk sort of only has a notion of root obligation, at least as presently designed. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not too concerned because I already fully expect to have to rework a lot of things when we try to land chalk :) |
||
// This is just for diagnostics, so it's okay if this is wrong | ||
root_obligation: obligation.clone(), | ||
}) | ||
.collect(); | ||
Err(errors) | ||
|
@@ -105,11 +108,14 @@ impl TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentContext<'tcx> { | |
), | ||
|
||
Err(_err) => errors.push(FulfillmentError { | ||
obligation, | ||
obligation: obligation.clone(), | ||
code: FulfillmentErrorCode::CodeSelectionError( | ||
SelectionError::Unimplemented, | ||
), | ||
points_at_arg_span: false, | ||
// FIXME - does Chalk have a notation of 'root obligation'? | ||
// This is just for diagnostics, so it's okay if this is wrong | ||
root_obligation: obligation, | ||
}), | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
|
@@ -119,11 +125,14 @@ impl TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentContext<'tcx> { | |
} | ||
|
||
Err(NoSolution) => errors.push(FulfillmentError { | ||
obligation, | ||
obligation: obligation.clone(), | ||
code: FulfillmentErrorCode::CodeSelectionError( | ||
SelectionError::Unimplemented, | ||
), | ||
points_at_arg_span: false, | ||
// FIXME - does Chalk have a notation of 'root obligation'? | ||
// This is just for diagnostics, so it's okay if this is wrong | ||
root_obligation: obligation, | ||
}), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.