Skip to content

Update chalk to 0.24.0 in rustc_middle and rustc_traits #77141

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

vandenheuvel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 24, 2020
@vandenheuvel vandenheuvel changed the title Update chalk to 0.22.0 in rustc_middle and rustc_traits Update chalk to 0.23.0 in rustc_middle and rustc_traits Sep 24, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup=never

cc @jackh726

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 24, 2020

📌 Commit 3b94575 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 24, 2020
@vandenheuvel vandenheuvel changed the title Update chalk to 0.23.0 in rustc_middle and rustc_traits Update chalk to 0.24.0 in rustc_middle and rustc_traits Sep 24, 2020
@vandenheuvel
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has been replaced with #77152.

@ijackson
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry about the spurious mention of this issue from my PR 77213. That was a github UI fail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants