Prefer libproc_macro APIs to libsyntax ones in the quasi-quoter. #45791
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The shift to using
proc_macro
's own APIs inproc_macro::quote
, both in the implementation of the quasi-quoter and the Rust code it generates to buildTokenStream
s at runtime, greatly reduces the dependency onlibsyntax
, with the generated runtime code being completely free of it.This is a prerequirement for introducing more abstraction/indirection between
proc_macro
and compiler implementation details (mainly those fromlibsyntax
), which I want to attempt.cc @alexcrichton @jseyfried @nrc