doc: Use "macOS" terminology consistently #40102
Conversation
One line in the documentation used the term macOS while the other six used OSX. Be consistent and use the name current product brand of macOS.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors: r+ rollup thank you! |
|
📌 Commit 1eb3432 has been approved by |
doc: Use "macOS" terminology consistently One line in the documentation used the term macOS while the other six used OSX. Be consistent and use the current product brand of macOS.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
One line in the documentation used the term macOS while the other six used OSX. Be consistent and use the current product brand of macOS.