-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Add missing word to TRPL's 'The Heap' section #29247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors: r+ rollup Thanks so much! |
📌 Commit 2e0e32f has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 2e0e32f with merge 631bdca... |
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt |
@bors: retry |
⚡ Previous build results for auto-linux-cross-opt, auto-mac-32-opt, auto-mac-64-nopt-t, auto-win-msvc-32-opt are reusable. Rebuilding only auto-linux-32-nopt-t, auto-linux-32-opt, auto-linux-64-debug-opt, auto-linux-64-nopt-t, auto-linux-64-opt, auto-linux-64-x-android-t, auto-linux-musl-64-opt, auto-mac-64-opt, auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t, auto-win-gnu-32-opt, auto-win-gnu-64-nopt-t, auto-win-gnu-64-opt, auto-win-msvc-64-opt... |
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-musl-64-opt |
@bors: retry On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:04 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:
|
⌛ Testing commit 2e0e32f with merge 902a7de... |
💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t |
@bors: retry On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:26 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:
|
I somehow missed a word behind the numbers while going through this section, don't know what the best approach would be though since "**available** addresses" sounds good to me, too".
I somehow missed a word behind the numbers while going through this section, don't know what the best approach would be though since "available addresses" sounds good to me, too".