Skip to content

mk: Prefer target libs coming from their host #29237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

It looks like the target libs aren't actually the same across hosts so instead
of always packaging the target libs from CFG_BUILD take the target libs from the
host if we have them and then only failing that do we take them from CFG_BUILD.

Closes #29228

It looks like the target libs aren't actually the same across hosts so instead
of always packaging the target libs from CFG_BUILD take the target libs from the
host if we have them and then only failing that do we take them from CFG_BUILD.

Closes rust-lang#29228
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Oct 22, 2015

So horrible. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 22, 2015

📌 Commit 0528eff has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 23, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0528eff with merge 5fa96e9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2015
It looks like the target libs aren't actually the same across hosts so instead
of always packaging the target libs from CFG_BUILD take the target libs from the
host if we have them and then only failing that do we take them from CFG_BUILD.

Closes #29228
@bors bors merged commit 0528eff into rust-lang:master Oct 23, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the packaging branch October 28, 2015 05:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants