Skip to content

[r+] Doc fixes #20986

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2015
Merged

[r+] Doc fixes #20986

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2015

Conversation

alkor
Copy link
Contributor

@alkor alkor commented Jan 12, 2015

Corrections in TRPL macros guide

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ pub fn encode_metadata(parms: EncodeParams, krate: &ast::Crate) -> Vec<u8> {

// And here we run into yet another obscure archive bug: in which metadata
// loaded from archives may have trailing garbage bytes. Awhile back one of
// our tests was failing sporadically on the OSX 64-bit builders (both nopt
// our tests were failing sporadically on the OSX 64-bit builders (both nopt
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was correct "one test was failing"

@alkor
Copy link
Contributor Author

alkor commented Jan 12, 2015

Oops, there was a wrong patch, reverted it

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

This looks good to me, but can you squash into one commit, please? r=me after

Also, update description of macro invocation syntax:
after rust-lang#20563 there is
a number of additional limitations on macro syntax.
@alkor
Copy link
Contributor Author

alkor commented Jan 12, 2015

r= @steveklabnik

Squashed into one commit

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@alkor it only lets people with permission do it, and you have to put it on the commit, rather than the PR. But thanks!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2015
Doc fixes

Reviewed-by: steveklabnik
@alkor
Copy link
Contributor Author

alkor commented Jan 14, 2015

@steveklabnik Where can I find info about these r[-+=] commands? Readme at https://github.com/graydon/bors seems incomplete and I only briefly looked at the source code of bors.
Sorry, I should have asked this question earlier instead of trying to guess how the system works.

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis changed the title Doc fixes [r+] Doc fixes Jan 14, 2015
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@alkor
Copy link
Contributor Author

alkor commented Jan 14, 2015

@steveklabnik Thank you!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2015
[r+] Doc fixes

Reviewed-by: steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
[r+] Doc fixes

Reviewed-by: steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
[r+] Doc fixes

Reviewed-by: steveklabnik
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
Corrections in TRPL macros guide
@bors bors merged commit a3d87fa into rust-lang:master Jan 16, 2015
@alkor alkor deleted the doc-fixes branch January 16, 2015 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants