Skip to content

Change the last linux 64-bit snapshot #17288

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2014
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I'm rotating in some CentOS 5.10 bots so we actually build on Linux 2.6.18
like we advertise doing so. Currently the snapshots are incompatible with CentOS
5.10 due to snapshots requiring glibc 2.6 and CentOS 5.10 having glibc 2.5.

It turns out that rustc only requires one symbol from glibc 2.6, which is
futimens. The rust distribution itself does not use this symbol, but LLVM
conditionally detects it and then uses it. This symbol isn't even called as part
of the compilation process, so we don't even need it!

The new snapshot was generated following these instructions 1:

  1. Download the current x86_64 linux snapshot and unpack it.
  2. Open the rustc binary in a hex editor.
  3. Change the linkage against glibc 2.6 from strong to weak
  4. Write changes and re-run src/etc/make-snapshot.py
  5. Upload new tarball to S3

On CentOS 5.10 a warning is printed each time the snapshot runs that the symbol
cannot be found (anyone with glibc 2.6+ does not have this warning printed). The
key part is that we can bootstrap on CentOS 5.10 at this point. The next
snapshot will be naturally compatible with glibc 2.3 (even older!) and will not
need to be manually edited.

I'm rotating in some CentOS 5.10 bots so we *actually* build on Linux 2.6.18
like we advertise doing so. Currently the snapshots are incompatible with CentOS
5.10 due to snapshots requiring glibc 2.6 and CentOS 5.10 having glibc 2.5.

It turns out that rustc only requires *one* symbol from glibc 2.6, which is
`futimens`. The rust distribution itself does not use this symbol, but LLVM
conditionally detects it and then uses it. This symbol isn't even called as part
of the compilation process, so we don't even need it!

The new snapshot was generated following these instructions [1]:

1. Download the current x86_64 linux snapshot and unpack it.
2. Open the rustc binary in a hex editor.
3. Change the linkage against glibc 2.6 from strong to *weak*
4. Write changes and re-run src/etc/make-snapshot.py
5. Upload new tarball to S3

On CentOS 5.10 a warning is printed each time the snapshot runs that the symbol
cannot be found (anyone with glibc 2.6+ does not have this warning printed). The
key part is that we can *bootstrap* on CentOS 5.10 at this point. The next
snapshot will be naturally compatible with glibc 2.3 (even older!) and will not
need to be manually edited.

[1]: http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/wiki/wiki.cgi/NewAppsOnOldGlibc
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2014
I'm rotating in some CentOS 5.10 bots so we *actually* build on Linux 2.6.18
like we advertise doing so. Currently the snapshots are incompatible with CentOS
5.10 due to snapshots requiring glibc 2.6 and CentOS 5.10 having glibc 2.5.

It turns out that rustc only requires *one* symbol from glibc 2.6, which is
`futimens`. The rust distribution itself does not use this symbol, but LLVM
conditionally detects it and then uses it. This symbol isn't even called as part
of the compilation process, so we don't even need it!

The new snapshot was generated following these instructions [1]:

1. Download the current x86_64 linux snapshot and unpack it.
2. Open the rustc binary in a hex editor.
3. Change the linkage against glibc 2.6 from strong to *weak*
4. Write changes and re-run src/etc/make-snapshot.py
5. Upload new tarball to S3

On CentOS 5.10 a warning is printed each time the snapshot runs that the symbol
cannot be found (anyone with glibc 2.6+ does not have this warning printed). The
key part is that we can *bootstrap* on CentOS 5.10 at this point. The next
snapshot will be naturally compatible with glibc 2.3 (even older!) and will not
need to be manually edited.

[1]: http://jamesbond3142.no-ip.org/wiki/wiki.cgi/NewAppsOnOldGlibc
@sfackler
Copy link
Member

Will we need to do something similar for linux-i386?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Thankfully no, the snapshot builders always use the 64-bit triple as the build triple. Snapshots are only downloaded for the build triple, so we should be good.

@bors bors closed this Sep 16, 2014
@bors bors merged commit ba0c100 into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2014
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the change-snap branch September 16, 2014 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants