Skip to content

Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI #142076

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2025

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Jun 5, 2025

It's annoying when wrong doc comments in bootstrap break auto CI. This has happened a few times recently, and documenting bootstrap with the stage0 compiler should be pretty quick, so let's add it to PR CI.

r? @marcoieni

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 5, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
   Compiling utf-8 v0.7.6
   Compiling unsafe-libyaml v0.2.11
   Compiling ureq v3.0.8
   Compiling csv v1.3.1
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
##[error]The operation was canceled.
Cleaning up orphan processes

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2025

📌 Commit b1acf62 has been approved by marcoieni

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2025
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2025
Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI

It's annoying when wrong doc comments in bootstrap [break](rust-lang#141272 (comment)) `auto` CI. This has happened a few times recently, and documenting bootstrap with the stage0 compiler should be pretty quick, so let's add it to PR CI.

r? `@marcoieni`
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #137992 (Stabilise `os_string_pathbuf_leak`)
 - #141558 (Limit the size of cgu names when using the `-Zhuman-readable-cgu-name…)
 - #141797 (compiler: set Apple frame pointers by architecture)
 - #141857 (coretests: move float tests from num to floats module and use a more flexible macro to generate them)
 - #142045 (Make obligation cause code suggestions verbose)
 - #142076 (Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI)
 - #142110 (Add solaris targets to build-manifest)
 - #142131 (Make cast suggestions verbose)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 383df26 into rust-lang:master Jun 7, 2025
13 of 28 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 7, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2025
Rollup merge of #142076 - Kobzol:doc-bootstrap-ci, r=marcoieni

Check documentation of bootstrap in PR CI

It's annoying when wrong doc comments in bootstrap [break](#141272 (comment)) `auto` CI. This has happened a few times recently, and documenting bootstrap with the stage0 compiler should be pretty quick, so let's add it to PR CI.

r? ``@marcoieni``
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the doc-bootstrap-ci branch June 7, 2025 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants