Closed
Description
Compiling multigroup v0.1.0 (file:///home/omnipotententity/college/NRE4802/HW07/multigroup)
error: expected identifier, found `1.0`
--> main.rs:470:39
|
470 | let mut criticality_history = Vec{1.0};
| ^^^
error[E0425]: cannot find function `max` in this scope
--> main.rs:426:15
|
426 | res = max((*s1 / *s2 - 1.0).abs(), res);
| ^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: possible candidate is found in another module, you can import it into scope
|
11 | use std::cmp::max;
|
error[E0618]: expected function, found `{float}`
--> main.rs:398:57
|
398 | 1.0 * (if l != 0.0 {1.0} else {0.0}) * (if r != 0.0(r != 0.0) {1.0} else {0.0});
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#bug-reports
note: rustc 1.21.0 (3b72af97e 2017-10-09) running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'LocalTableInContext: key not found', /checkout/src/libcore/option.rs:819:4
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
stack backtrace:
0: std::sys::imp::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtrace
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/gcc_s.rs:49
1: std::sys_common::backtrace::_print
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:71
2: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:60
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:381
3: std::panicking::default_hook
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:391
4: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:611
5: std::panicking::begin_panic
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:572
6: std::panicking::begin_panic_fmt
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:522
7: rust_begin_unwind
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:498
8: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /checkout/src/libcore/panicking.rs:71
9: core::option::expect_failed
at /checkout/src/libcore/option.rs:819
10: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::walk_expr
11: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_expr
12: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::walk_expr
13: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_expr
14: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::walk_expr
15: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_expr
16: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::walk_expr
17: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_expr
18: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::walk_expr
19: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_expr
20: rustc::middle::expr_use_visitor::ExprUseVisitor::consume_body
21: <rustc_typeck::check::upvar::InferBorrowKindVisitor<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> as rustc::hir::intravisit::Visitor<'gcx>>::visit_expr
22: rustc::hir::intravisit::walk_block
23: <rustc_typeck::check::upvar::InferBorrowKindVisitor<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> as rustc::hir::intravisit::Visitor<'gcx>>::visit_expr
24: rustc_typeck::check::typeck_tables_of::{{closure}}
25: rustc_typeck::check::typeck_tables_of
26: rustc::dep_graph::graph::DepGraph::with_task
27: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::maps::queries::typeck_tables_of<'tcx>>::try_get
28: rustc::ty::maps::TyCtxtAt::typeck_tables_of
29: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'lcx>>::typeck_tables_of
30: rustc_typeck::check::typeck_item_bodies
31: rustc::dep_graph::graph::DepGraph::with_task
32: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::maps::queries::typeck_item_bodies<'tcx>>::try_get
33: rustc::ty::maps::TyCtxtAt::typeck_item_bodies
34: rustc::ty::maps::<impl rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'lcx>>::typeck_item_bodies
35: rustc_typeck::check_crate
36: rustc::ty::context::TyCtxt::create_and_enter
37: rustc_driver::driver::compile_input
38: rustc_driver::run_compiler
error: Could not compile `multigroup`.
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
My code is about 500 lines long. I'm running up against an assignment deadline, so I don't have time right now to make a minimal demonstration. But if needed I can do so after Thursday, if someone hasn't gotten to it already.
Sorry to dump and run. I normally try to be better about bug reports. :/
I expect this to be related to my copy paste error with repeated if clause: (if r != 0.0(r != 0.0) {1.0} else {0.0});
EDIT: Removed code, as there is a minimal example below.