Skip to content

Missed enum layout optimization depending on enum variant field reordering #125630

Closed
@cmrschwarz

Description

@cmrschwarz

rustc fails to optimize the enum Layout of V1 and V2 of the (real world) example type LazyRwLockGuard to 24 bytes.

In case of V1, this might be be due to #101567.

But the case of V2 seems to be a separate issue, as it is identical to V3 (which is optimized correctly), except for the ordering of the fields inside the Read enum variant.

(For clarity, RwLockReadGuard and RwLockWriteGuard each use 16 bytes and contain a niche).

use std::sync::*;

// could use 24 bytes, uses 32 (probably known issue, #101567)
pub enum LazyRwLockGuardV1<'a, T> {
    Unlocked(&'a RwLock<T>),
    Read {
        lock: &'a RwLock<T>,
        guard: RwLockReadGuard<'a, T>,
    },    
    Write(RwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>),
}

// helper subtype (16 Bytes) so the main type figures out it's Niche correctly
pub enum LazyRwLockWriteGuard<'a, T> {
    Unlocked(&'a RwLock<T>),
    Write(RwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>),
}

// this type should now be 24 bytes, but unfortunately still uses 32
pub enum LazyRwLockGuardV2<'a, T> {
    Read {
        lock: &'a RwLock<T>,
        guard: RwLockReadGuard<'a, T>,
    },    
    NonRead(LazyRwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>),
}

// this type correctly uses 24 bytes
pub enum LazyRwLockGuardV3<'a, T> {
    Read {
        guard: RwLockReadGuard<'a, T>,
        lock: &'a RwLock<T>, // fields reordered
    },    
    NonRead(LazyRwLockWriteGuard<'a, T>),
}

godbolt repro
stackoverflow question

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-layoutArea: Memory layout of typesC-optimizationCategory: An issue highlighting optimization opportunities or PRs implementing suchT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions