Add blog post on CVE-2022-21658

posts/2022-01-20-cve-2022-21658.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Security advisory for the standard library (CVE-2022-21658)"
+author: The Rust Security Response WG
+---
+
+> This is a cross-post of [the official security advisory][advisory]. The
+> official advisory contains a signed version with our PGP key, as well.
+
+[advisory]: https://groups.google.com/g/rustlang-security-announcements/c/R1fZFDhnJVQ
+
+The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the `std::fs::remove_dir_all`
+standard library function is vulneable a race condition enabling symlink
+following (CWE-363). An attacker could use this security issue to trick a
+privileged program into deleting files and directories the attacker couldn't
+otherwise access or delete.
+
+This issue has been assigned [CVE-2022-21658][1].
+
+## Overview
+
+Let's suppose an attacker obtained unprivileged access to a system and needed
+to delete a system directory called `sensitive/`, but they didn't have the
+permissions to do so. If `std::fs::remove_dir_all` followed symbolic links,
+they could find a privileged program that removes a directory they have access
+to (called `temp/`), create a symlink from `temp/foo` to `sensitive/`, and wait
+for the privileged program to delete `foo/`. The privileged program would
+follow the symlink from `temp/foo` to `sensitive/` while recursively deleting,
+resulting in `sensitive/` being deleted.
+
+To prevent such attacks, `std::fs::remove_dir_all` already includes protection
+to avoid recursively deleting symlinks, as described in its documentation:
+
+> This function does **not** follow symbolic links and it will simply remove
+> the symbolic link itself.
+
+Unfortunately that check was implemented incorrectly in the standard library,
+resulting in a TOCTOU (Time-of-check Time-of-use) race condition. Instead of
+telling the system not to follow symlinks, the standard library first checked
+whether the thing it was about to delete was a symlink, and otherwise it would
+proceed to recursively delete the directory.
+
+This exposed a race condition: an attacker could create a directory and replace
+it with a symlink between the check and the actual deletion. While this attack
+likely won't work the first time it's attempted, in our experimentation we were
+able to reliably perform it within a couple of seconds.
+
+## Affected Versions
+
+Rust 1.0.0 through Rust 1.58.0 is affected by this vulnerability. We're going
+to release Rust 1.58.1 later today, which will include mitigations for this
+vulnerability. Patches to the Rust standard library are also available for
+custom-built Rust toolchains here (TODO: link).
+
+Note that the following targets don't have usable APIs to properly mitigate the
+attack, and are thus still vulnerable even with a patched toolchain:
+
+* macOS before version 10.10 (Yosemite)
+* REDOX
+
+## Mitigations
+
+We recommend everyone to update to Rust 1.58.1 as soon as possible, especially
+people developing programs expected to run in privileged contexts (including
+system daemons and setuid binaries), as those have the highest risk of being
+affected by this.
+
+Note that adding checks in your codebase before calling `remove_dir_all` will
+**not** mitigate the vulnerability, as they would also be vulnerable to race
+conditions like `remove_dir_all` itself. The existing mitigation is working as
+intended outside of race conditions.
+
+## Acknowledgments
+
+We want to thank Hans Kratz for independently discovering and disclosing this
+issue to us according to the [Rust security policy][2], for developing the fix
+for UNIX-like targets and for reviewing fixes for other platforms.
+
+We also want to thank Florian Weimer for reviewing the UNIX-like fix and for
+reporting the same issue back in 2018, even though the Security Response WG
+didn't realize the severity of the issue at the time.
+
+Finally we want to thank Pietro Albini for coordinating the security response
+and writing this advisory, Chris Denton for writing the Windows fix, Alex
+Crichton for writing the WASI fix, and Mara Bos for reviewing the patches.
+
+[1]: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21658
+[2]: https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/security