Add Governance WG CFP

posts/inside-rust/2019-11-13-goverance-wg-cfp.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: "Governance WG Call For Participation"
+author: Erin Power
+team: The Governance WG <https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-governance>
+---
+
+Hello everyone, the governance working group has been working a few efforts, but
+we haven't made as much progress as we would have liked over the past few
+months, so we are going to try out a new process and meeting agenda aimed at
+trying to get more work done in the time we know we have.
+
+## New Meeting Structure
+
+Previously we have been doing most of our work async while using our bi-weekly
+meeting call to triage tasks. The problem we ran into with this is that a lot of
+the members also heavy contributors to the Rust project as a whole, and it can
+be can hard for some people to schedule time write an initial draft.
+
+To address this instead of triaging during the meeting and working on tasks in
+async, we're going to hold focused topic based meetings, and use the time between
+meetings, to publish posts like this and to research and prepare for the next
+topic. To help do this we're going to extend our current meeting duration from
+30 minutes to an hour. (The meeting will still be every two weeks.)
+
+The current goals are to documenting the de-facto governance structure, provide
+the result as a RFC and then if merged provide a version on
+[forge.rust-lang.org](https://forge.rust-lang.org/) so that it has greater visbility. We also want to
+schedule people involved in Rust and other governance structures to come and
+talk about their experiences.
+
+For deciding what topics, we're going to rotate who takes the lead for each
+meeting. It's that person's responsibility to decide the topic and to
+prepare a call for participation similar to this post informing people of
+the topic and how they might best prepare if they wish to join.
+
+We also hope that having a focused topic will reduce any barrier of expected
+knowledge in order to participate and contribute. With that said let's talk
+about the topic for next meeting.
+
+## Reviewing & Examining Previous Governance RFCs
+
+Our first topic for new meeting is going to be to read [RFC 1068], the
+original Rust Governance RFC, review how accurate it is to today's structure,
+and see any if there are questions that we have that it doesn't answer. Here
+are some other relevant RFCs for additional context:
+
+- ["North Star" RFC] lays out the Rust roadmap process.
+- [Compiler contributors RFC] details the process of contributing to the
+  compiler and progression towards joining the compiler team.
+- [Compiler bug fix procedure] defines the best practices for making a bug fix
+  to the compiler.
+
+Our next meeting is going to be at **22:00 UTC on Tuesday, November 19th**
+and we'd like to encourage anyone who's interested, regardless of their
+previous experience to read those RFCs and come to the `#wg-governance`
+channel on discord to attend the meeting. (Our meetings are done over a video
+call with Zoom, but we use the discord channel to organise ourselves).
+
+If some reason you know you won't be able to attend these meetings but would
+still like to participate. Please feel free to post any questions about Rust's
+governance as [issues on our GitHub repository][gh-issues], even if you are 
+not available to attend the working group's meetings.
+
+[rfc 1068]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1068-rust-governance.html
+["north star" rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/26197104b7bb9a5a35db243d639aee6e46d35d75/text/1728-north-star.md
+[compiler contributors rfc]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2689-compiler-team-contributors.html
+[compiler bug fix procedure]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1589-rustc-bug-fix-procedure.html
+[gh-issues]: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-governance/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AQuestion