Organize package.json content

[cometkim]

Hoisted up the package's basic information. Arranged them in a meaningful order.

And changed the current maintainer information to @cristianoc 's one

[cristianoc]

Would you add the other maintainers too to this list, eg everyone showing up in the drop down when ask ing for a review.

[cometkim]

eg everyone showing up in the drop down when ask ing for a review.

I cannot ask for a review myself as I don't have access to do that. Can you share the actual maintainer list?

Or we can add a CODEOWNERS file

[cristianoc]

eg everyone showing up in the drop down when ask ing for a review.

I cannot ask for a review myself as I don't have access to do that. Can you share the actual maintainer list?

Or we can add a CODEOWNERS file

Let me abuse the system and as for a bunch of reviews to this PR...

[cristianoc]

eg everyone showing up in the drop down when ask ing for a review.

I cannot ask for a review myself as I don't have access to do that. Can you share the actual maintainer list?
Or we can add a CODEOWNERS file

Let me abuse the system and as for a bunch of reviews to this PR...

OK see list of reviewers to this PR.

[cometkim]

Lol thanks

[cometkim]

Since there are many, I can format it as shortened like "Name (homepage)". Btw, the value of the author/maintainers/contributors field is identified based on NPM user info.

It seems like some of you don't prefer exposing email (or name) on it. That's totally fine, but I wanna make sure everyone here is ok.

Actually I can scrape npm user info and check your email via npx npm-user-cli <npm-user-name>. So I can see some of your have different email settings between NPM and GitHub, etc. In those cases, This may appear as a different ID in the NPM. This can happened in shared domains like gmail.com

To avoid these potential problems, I suggest unifying the format as "Name (GitHub address)". Except for Bob's profile, which originally existed.

[cknitt]

I'm a bit torn here.
On the one hand, I would put Cristiano and Gabriel first, but on the other hand sorting contributors alphabetically makes sense, too.

@cristianoc @zth what do you think?

[cristianoc]

I'm a bit torn here. On the one hand, I would put Cristiano and Gabriel first, but on the other hand sorting contributors alphabetically makes sense, too.

@cristianoc @zth what do you think?

Alphabetical sounds great.

[tsnobip]

LGTM. Putting Gabriel and Cristiano first would indeed make sense too, as you guys want!

[mununki]

It seems we're missing Comet Kim from the list.

[cknitt]

It seems we're missing Comet Kim from the list.

Right! @cometkim would you add yourself, too? 🙂

[cometkim]

Haha thanks. But not this moment 😅

[cometkim]

Oh well, I've been invited

[cometkim]

Btw, do we prefer maintainers or contributors (which have same meaning in the NPM manifest)

[cometkim]

Co-approved 😁

[cknitt]

Btw, do we prefer maintainers or contributors (which have same meaning in the NPM manifest)

No opinion on that.
PR is good to go from my view.

@jfrolich @ryyppy @zth @mununki your approval is still missing - ok for you, too?

[mununki]

No opinion on that. PR is good to go from my view.

@jfrolich @ryyppy @zth @mununki your approval is still missing - ok for you, too?

It's my honor.

[cknitt]

Merging now. Any objections by those who have not answered yet can be addressed in separate PRs. 🙂