Skip to content

Clean AutorecoveringConnection consumers correctly #209

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2016

Conversation

acogoluegnes
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #208

@acogoluegnes acogoluegnes added this to the 3.6.x milestone Oct 21, 2016
@michaelklishin michaelklishin modified the milestones: 3.6.6, 3.6.x Oct 21, 2016
@michaelklishin michaelklishin self-assigned this Oct 21, 2016
@michaelklishin michaelklishin modified the milestones: n/a, 3.6.6 Oct 21, 2016
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit 41f3a86 into stable Oct 21, 2016
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

@acogoluegnes please merge this into master (there are conflicts).

@vikinghawk
Copy link
Contributor

vikinghawk commented Oct 21, 2016

When a consumer is recovered it gets a new consumerTag right? I'm thinking AutorecoveringConnection.recoverConsumers() should remove the old tag and add the new one to the AutorecoveringChannel.consumerTags set.

@acogoluegnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good catch! Should be done around here: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-java-client/blob/master/src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/recovery/AutorecoveringConnection.java#L659

I'll work on that, thanks for reporting!

@acogoluegnes acogoluegnes deleted the rabbitmq-java-client-208 branch March 21, 2019 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants