Skip to content

Cherry-pick: [ONNX] Update dynamo_export tutorial (#3196) #3265

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

svekars
Copy link
Contributor

@svekars svekars commented Jan 27, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 27, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/3265

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 226bd3d with merge base c2faee4 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@svekars svekars changed the title [ONNX] Update dynamo_export tutorial (#3196) Cherry-pick: [ONNX] Update dynamo_export tutorial (#3196) Jan 27, 2025
@svekars svekars added 2.6 Tracking 2.6 version PRs. skip-link-check Will allow you to skip linkcheck on a PR. Should only should be used when a link can't be fixed. labels Jan 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@titaiwangms titaiwangms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! We need this to rebase #3223 to main!

@svekars svekars merged commit 8f0518c into main Jan 27, 2025
20 checks passed
@svekars svekars deleted the cherry-pick-onnx-2.6-updates branch January 28, 2025 22:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.6 Tracking 2.6 version PRs. cla signed skip-link-check Will allow you to skip linkcheck on a PR. Should only should be used when a link can't be fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants