Skip to content

Fix pt2e quant ptq x86 section title issue #2746

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

leslie-fang-intel
Copy link
Contributor

@leslie-fang-intel leslie-fang-intel commented Jan 24, 2024

Description

The previous section title for pt2e ptq quant of X86 Inductor is incorrect. Fix it in this PR.

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description (see above "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER")
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

cc @svekars @brycebortree

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 24, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/2746

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 4a2d17d with merge base 219a9e3 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@leslie-fang-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jerryzh168, please kindly help to take a look.

@svekars svekars added the website Issues related to website rendering label Jan 24, 2024
@leslie-fang-intel leslie-fang-intel force-pushed the leslie/fix_pt2e_quant_ptq_x86_inductor_title_issue branch from 4a2d17d to d9a0d6b Compare January 25, 2024 01:37
@leslie-fang-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I think the title format issue already been addressed in #2717

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed website Issues related to website rendering
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants