Skip to content

notebook: GLM rolling regression (run with pymc v5) #511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 2, 2023

Conversation

reshamas
Copy link
Member

Description

Run notebook with pymc v5

Helpful links

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@reshamas
Copy link
Member Author

@OriolAbril
Not sure what the issue is in doc building failure, as I reran the notebook and didn't make any significant changes.

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

I think sphinx-codeautolink had a new release, can you try adding a <latest release pin in requirements-docs.txt?

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

There already is a patch release of codeautolink and the build works again

@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ cb.ax.set_yticklabels(ticklabels);

- Created by [Thomas Wiecki](https://github.com/twiecki/)
- Updated by [Benjamin T. Vincent](https://github.com/drbenvincent) June 2022
- Run PyMC v5 by Reshama Shaikh, January 2023

+++

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be merged already, but ideally I would remove aeppl from the watermark

@OriolAbril OriolAbril merged commit cef367c into pymc-devs:main Feb 2, 2023
@reshamas
Copy link
Member Author

reshamas commented Feb 2, 2023

Ah, Oriol, I was rerunning the notebook to remove the aeppl watermark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants