Skip to content

Conflicting approaches to supporting shared properties #92

Closed
@tesujimath

Description

@tesujimath

So, I just noticed the new release, which includes #91. Which addresses a problem which was already addressed by #84.

Maintaining some properties independently of the codegen seems a bit of a hack to me. Isn't the right way to do this to merge #84 and rollback on the alternate approach?

Note that #84 also addresses #88

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions