Skip to content

remove obsolete files #3141

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

remove obsolete files #3141

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chohner
Copy link
Contributor

@chohner chohner commented Apr 8, 2021

Code PR

  • I have read through the contributing notes and understand the structure of the package. In particular, if my PR modifies code of plotly.graph_objects, my modifications concern the codegen files and not generated files.
  • I have added tests (if submitting a new feature or correcting a bug) or
    modified existing tests.
  • For a new feature, I have added documentation examples in an existing or
    new tutorial notebook (please see the doc checklist as well).
  • I have added a CHANGELOG entry if fixing/changing/adding anything substantial.
  • For a new feature or a change in behaviour, I have updated the relevant docstrings in the code to describe the feature or behaviour (please see the doc checklist as well).

This simply removes three very old files at root level related to building a conda package that obsolete since at least commit 8586a2a (about 2.5 years ago, release v3.2.0). The content is very outdated and its very unlikely that it is going to be useful for anyone.

@nicolaskruchten
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for this PR! I'm not sure I understand what these files were for initially... how can we be sure they're obsolete?

@chohner
Copy link
Contributor Author

chohner commented Apr 22, 2021

I added some additional explanation at the end of the PR description. TLDR: conda packages are built on CI and these local script files are not used and VERY out of date

@nicolaskruchten
Copy link
Contributor

Ok thanks for the diligent follow up many months later :)

@nicolaskruchten
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks again! I redid this PR and merged that one to avoid making you resolve a merge conflict :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants