Skip to content

Allow Symfony 3.0 #180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 23, 2016
Merged

Allow Symfony 3.0 #180

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 23, 2016

Conversation

dantleech
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dantleech
Copy link
Member Author

Not so simple -- guess this might be a good time to release 1.0 and only support ~2.8

@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Aug 23, 2016

yep, go for symfony 2.8.

maybe tag the current state as 0.9 to indicate its not a 1.0.0 and that it won't be supported going forward.

when used as phar, the symfony version is not that relevant (as long as people are using a maintained version of php and not 5.3 or 5.4)

@@ -2,28 +2,25 @@
"name": "phpcr/phpcr-shell",
"description": "Shell for PHPCR",
"require": {
"symfony/console": "~2.4",
"symfony/console": "~2.4|~3.0",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.8

@dantleech
Copy link
Member Author

@dbu 1.0.0-beta3 is already the "current" state, more or less.

Different method signature on 2.8 and 3.0 makes overriding this tricky,
and I am unsure of the benefits anyway.
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
class PhpcrShell
{
const APP_NAME = 'PHPCRSH';
const APP_VERSION = 'dev-master';
const APP_VERSION = '1.0.0-beta4';
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

upda

@dantleech dantleech merged commit 7e45f81 into master Aug 23, 2016
@dantleech dantleech removed the wip/poc label Aug 23, 2016
@dantleech
Copy link
Member Author

Bam

@dantleech dantleech deleted the allow_3_0 branch August 23, 2016 15:07
@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Aug 23, 2016 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants