-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Avoid crash for reset/end/next/prev() on ffi classes #9716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
--TEST-- | ||
FFI: Test deprecated use of array helper functions on FFI classes doesn't crash | ||
--SKIPIF-- | ||
<?php require_once('skipif.inc'); ?> | ||
--INI-- | ||
ffi.enable=1 | ||
--FILE-- | ||
<?php | ||
error_reporting(E_ALL & ~E_DEPRECATED); | ||
$data = FFI::new('int'); | ||
var_dump(reset($data)); | ||
var_dump(end($data)); | ||
var_dump(next($data)); | ||
var_dump(prev($data)); | ||
?> | ||
--EXPECTF-- | ||
bool(false) | ||
bool(false) | ||
bool(false) | ||
bool(false) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about ZTS builds? Technically, having multiple parallel threads calling reset() would be writing to this static array simultaneously.
That'd probably be writing the exact same value concurrently if multiple threads concurrently called reset(), which would be safe on most architectures, but may be unsafe in obscure architectures.
A bigger issue would be whether bugs in opcache, PECLs, the engine, or internal functions could actually write properties to this empty array - those would affect not only the given request, but all subsequent requests.
Doing something like ext/session and putting this in the request globals in rinit would limit the effect of bugs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. You are right. Lets commit your solution.
I think, FFI was developed before
get_properties_for
was added.obj->properties for FFI objects just don't make sense.
If you like, you may refactor ext/ffi to use `get_properties_for``