Skip to content

Fix opcache testing in CI #8350

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

mvorisek
Copy link
Contributor

@mvorisek mvorisek commented Apr 12, 2022

fix JIT testing on MacOS & unify the config across platforms

discovered in #7563 (comment) discussion

@@ -68,25 +68,28 @@ jobs:
with:
runTestsParameters: >-
${{ matrix.run_tests_parameters }}
- name: Test Tracing JIT
- name: Test OpCache
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I belive testing opcache prior /w JIT is better

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's intentionally chosen this way because tracing jit has a higher chance of failing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, exactly - the way it is now will fail the CI pipeline earlier, which is definitely not wanted for nightly pipeline
with opcache /wo JIT first, CI will report correctly if the issue is opcache itself or related /w JIT only
makes sense?

@mvorisek mvorisek marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2022 12:58
@mvorisek mvorisek force-pushed the fix_opcache_ci_macos branch from 64f7a93 to c8ca933 Compare April 12, 2022 19:39
@iluuu1994 iluuu1994 closed this in e3f2846 Apr 14, 2022
@iluuu1994
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@mvorisek mvorisek deleted the fix_opcache_ci_macos branch April 14, 2022 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants