Use SipHash-1-3 for string and integer hashing #2149
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rebase of an old experiment for SipHash-2-4. Nowadays SipHash-1-3 is considered sufficient for hash tables, so we try that.
Micro-benchmark results for array operations x86-64 (first column with siphash, second column baseline):
As such, we see about 120% regression for operations on non-packed integer hashes and about 50% on non-cached string hashes.