-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Use new ZPP and inline caches in ReflectionProperty::getValue() and variants #17698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
arnaud-lb
merged 3 commits into
php:master
from
arnaud-lb:reflection-property-get-value-opt
Feb 17, 2025
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not that it actually matters, but I'm curious why you didn't just do
Z_ISUNDEF_P
and instead go through the type infoUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a copy of the happy path of
ZEND_FETCH_OBJ_R
here:php-src/Zend/zend_vm_def.h
Lines 2073 to 2076 in 3967b7a
I think the original code uses
Z_TYPE_INFO_P()
rather thanZ_TYPE_P()
/Z_ISUNDEF_P()
becausetype_info
is accessed again just after. Here it's not the case, andZ_TYPE_INFO_P() != IS_UNDEF
generates similar code as!Z_ISUNDEF_P()
, so I could switch toZ_ISUNDEF_P()
.