-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Fix GH-11274: POST/PATCH request via file_get_contents + stream_context_create switches to GET after a HTTP 308 redirect #11275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ | ||
--TEST-- | ||
GH-11274 (POST/PATCH request via file_get_contents + stream_context_create switches to GET after a HTTP 308 redirect) | ||
--INI-- | ||
allow_url_fopen=1 | ||
--CONFLICTS-- | ||
server | ||
--FILE-- | ||
<?php | ||
$serverCode = <<<'CODE' | ||
$uri = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']; | ||
if (isset($_GET["desired_status"]) && $uri[strlen($uri) - 1] !== '/') { | ||
$desired_status = (int) $_GET["desired_status"]; | ||
http_response_code($desired_status); | ||
header("Location: $uri/"); | ||
exit; | ||
} | ||
|
||
echo "method: ", $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'], "; body: ", file_get_contents('php://input'), "\n"; | ||
CODE; | ||
|
||
include __DIR__."/../../../../sapi/cli/tests/php_cli_server.inc"; | ||
php_cli_server_start($serverCode, null, []); | ||
|
||
foreach ([null, 301, 302, 307, 308] as $status) { | ||
if (is_null($status)) { | ||
echo "-- Testing unredirected request --\n"; | ||
} else { | ||
echo "-- Testing redirect status code $status --\n"; | ||
} | ||
$suffix = $status ? "?desired_status=$status" : ""; | ||
echo file_get_contents("http://" . PHP_CLI_SERVER_ADDRESS . "/test$suffix", false, stream_context_create(['http' => ['method' => 'POST', 'header' => 'Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded', 'content' => http_build_query(['hello' => 'world'])]])); | ||
echo file_get_contents("http://" . PHP_CLI_SERVER_ADDRESS . "/test$suffix", false, stream_context_create(['http' => ['method' => 'PATCH', 'header' => 'Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded', 'content' => http_build_query(['hello' => 'world'])]])); | ||
echo file_get_contents("http://" . PHP_CLI_SERVER_ADDRESS . "/test/$suffix", false, stream_context_create(['http' => ['method' => 'POST', 'header' => 'Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded', 'content' => http_build_query(['hello' => 'world'])]])); | ||
echo file_get_contents("http://" . PHP_CLI_SERVER_ADDRESS . "/test/$suffix", false, stream_context_create(['http' => ['method' => 'PATCH', 'header' => 'Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded', 'content' => http_build_query(['hello' => 'world'])]])); | ||
} | ||
?> | ||
--EXPECT-- | ||
-- Testing unredirected request -- | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world | ||
-- Testing redirect status code 301 -- | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
-- Testing redirect status code 302 -- | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
method: GET; body: | ||
-- Testing redirect status code 307 -- | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world | ||
-- Testing redirect status code 308 -- | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world | ||
method: POST; body: hello=world | ||
method: PATCH; body: hello=world |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The question here is which RFC this code was implemented for. If it was https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2616#section-10.3.8, then it's not exactly clear (at least to me). Anyway I think it should be right thing to prohibit changing of the method even for 8.1 so I'm fine with treating this as a bug. This is just a side note that we don't always treat things as a bug if they change in the later RFC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. It gets even more unclear when you read the note below "10.3.3 302 found" in the RFC you linked:
So it sounds like the behaviour even for 302 got changed later on (as is clear from the table in RFC 7538) because lots of clients implemented it in another way than originally intended back in the day.
Fortunately, those rules are better defined nowadays in current RFCs.