Skip to content

ENH: get_resolution support non-nano #47322

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the Github issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.


def test_get_resolution_non_nano_data():
arr = np.array([1], dtype=np.int64)
res = get_resolution(arr, None, NpyDatetimeUnit.NPY_FR_us.value)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe test with UTC and None?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good idea, updated

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution label Jun 13, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.5 milestone Jun 13, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit a8d8ae7 into pandas-dev:main Jun 13, 2022
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the nano-reso branch June 14, 2022 01:24
yehoshuadimarsky pushed a commit to yehoshuadimarsky/pandas that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2022
* ENH: get_resolution support non-nano

* tzaware case
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants