CLN: Fix common spelling mistakes #32895
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SaturnFromTitan
force-pushed
the
spellings
branch
from
5d615e1 to
cf01877
Compare
SaturnFromTitan
force-pushed
the
spellings
branch
from
25183a2 to
cf01877
Compare
|
looks fine ping on green. |
|
/azp run |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 32895 in repo pandas-dev/pandas |
SaturnFromTitan
force-pushed
the
spellings
branch
from
cf01877 to
2bd419b
Compare
|
@jreback CI is green |
|
Thanks @SaturnFromTitan |
SeeminSyed
pushed a commit
to CSCD01-team01/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2020
jbrockmendel
pushed a commit
to jbrockmendel/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I applied this awesome automatic spell fixer to our codebase. I needed to do a manual review as it was attempting to fix some names, but the false-positive rate was pretty low!
They also provide a GitHub action for automatic checks on PRs. Might be helpful, especially for the
docs.If this is merged, I can create a follow-up issue for a discussion on the CI hook.